Mr Catechis gave an overview of the worldwide defence industry and the investment case for pension funds.
For the next 10 years the NATO countries, excluding the US, will spend 500 – 600 billion euro annually to restore the lagging defence investments. Defence budgets of NATO countries are increasing. For example Poland is investing 3% of its Gross Domestic product on defence.
A recent NATO poll under 30,000 members of the population of NATO countries showed an increasing percentage under the population - up to 40% in the Netherlands – in favour of more defence investments. This suggests that pension plan participants may also want to see more investments made by their pension funds in the growing defence industry.
An obstacle for state funded defence is the worldwide increasing governement debt and the annual servicing costs. In addition, shrinking populations generate less tax income to invest in defence. Private markets offer a solution.
For example, investing in listed stocks of defence companies is often a suitable investment for pension funds. As is investing in fixed income through bonds issued by defence companies. Another option is to invest in real assets such as a shipyard for frigates. Private equity and venture capital type investments often invest in dual use technology, whereby technology can be used in both the civilian and the defence sector. An example is the development of drones, which can be used for reconnaissance in enemy territory, or to locate survivors of an earthquake.
For private investments ESG may be an obstacle if the defence sector is viewed from a strictly environmental point of view. If, however, security is taken into account, ESG may not be an obstacle at all. This is for pension funds to decide on.